If
MetaAutomation is too much change for right now…
Make
your checks simple, to improve scalability of your check runs with more
resources and to improve the business value of your quality data. (OK, that’s “improve
the quality of your quality data” and yes I know that might sound silly.)
There
is a pattern called “Chained Tests” that occurs in the wild, and described
here: http://xunitpatterns.com/Chained%20Tests.html
but it’s actually a very bad idea. I’d call it an antipattern. The linked page
goes into the negatives a bit, but I will add a more modern reason to NEVER
chain your tests: they won’t scale. Chained tests must be run in a sequence, so
it doesn’t matter how much computing resources you allocate, the check (aka “test”)
run won’t go any faster.
As
an extension of the “scalability” reasoning, make your checks simple. Each
check should have no more than one target verification or verification cluster,
and NOT have superfluous verifications that can either slow the check down
and/or make it less robust and more fragile than it would otherwise be.
Here is a color version of one of the diagrams illustrating the Atomic Check pattern in the book on MetaAutomation:
Another
way to simplify the checks, and make them faster, is to use the Precondition
Pool pattern of MetaAutomation.
This
page is #4 in a series of six, with the original post here.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.